Tag Archives: election

I Was Right. Even Murder Can’t Cure Leftist Brainwashing

This is Philip Wyeth here to say that I was right. I was spot-on in my characterization of a social justice warrior, and I’ll tell you why.

I’m sure you’ve seen the news story about Mollie Tibbetts getting killed by an illegal alien. And we just saw one of her relatives said, “Please remember evil comes in every color.” This is proof of how brainwashed liberals, even at the time of their own relative being murdered, play a mental game to get away from the feeling of bloodlust.

And I’ll relate a personal anecdote to you as well. A couple months ago I attended the memorial service for a murdered relative of one of my in-laws, and at that ceremony I met a female relative who lives in LA. So we agreed to get together, and this was about a month later we got together, and at one point I asked her how her mother—a close relation of the murdered man—was handling things, because at the memorial service she broke down.

And this is what she told me. Nothing to do about how her mom was recovering, but simply that an accomplice after the fact, who was paid by the murderers to clean up the crime scene, was caught, pled guilty and got two years in prison. And she said, “Wow, two years in prison is sure a long time for someone who wasn’t involved in the crime.”

What?! What about bloodlust? What about anger? What about rage? Even if you’re fine with the person going to jail as opposed to you beating them up or killing them, if anybody was involved with the murder of one of my friends or relatives… You have to be angry, you have to be furious. You can’t think about, in this case she said privilege, she did the mental abacus thing and talked about some court case where a white guy raped a college student and only got six months.

Cherry-picking to fill her liberal narrative. So, why was I right? I’m gonna read you an excerpt from “Reparations USA,” a book I wrote summer of 2017, and in this chapter I break apart the mindset of the social justice warrior, in the case of my character Kate Donohugh. Here are several short excerpts:

“…an unsparing inner voice that turned making even routine decisions into a statistical analysis ritual, which involved going down a mental checklist to consider how anything she was about to do might affect someone else less fortunate than her.

“Kate tangled her mind in knots trying to think of new ways she could eradicate her privilege. But now she was beginning to suspect that no matter what selfless act she performed, there would always be something else to account for. And how could you sleep peacefully, let alone function, when the goalposts kept moving?

“What virtuous acts would serve to fully exorcise the guilt she now felt for passing decades of her life blind to the thousand micro-advantages she had taken for granted?”

And that’s it. That is where we are. You saw the story last week about those cyclists who, to prove people are good, went and rode their bike all over the world and got killed in a dangerous country. It may be that there’s no reasoning with people like this, if they’re so far gone, having succumbed to the brainwashing of the mainstream media, universities, public schools, Hollywood.

On the one hand you want to sympathize with them, empathize with them, try to reach out a hand to pull them back from the brink. But with this kind of pathological altruism maybe you just need to step back and save yourself, protect your family.

Because these people are so separated from what it means to be a human, and to have the passion and the love to actually stand up for your people when they’re being killed… Or you’re being killed yourself! There’s nothing we can do.

So I would hope that you would support me as an author, because I clearly have my finger on the pulse of something going on in society. The first book, “Reparations USA,” is free on platforms like Barnes & Noble and iTunes, only $0.99 as an e-book on Amazon. And the second book “Reparations Mind” is available on all these platforms. Paperback and e-book on
Amazon for both books.

I’m currently working on the third book right now, it could possibly be a four book series. So help me out and we’ll stick together as the crazy election season approaches. Thanks for listening.

This video can also be watched on the following platforms:
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/a5hUugyIw_s
Minds: https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/879372568658587648
Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/5825859369001

Video was originally uploaded on August 23, 2018.

Why I Wrote a Book About Reparations for Slavery

This is Philip Wyeth. So the question is, why did I write a book about Reparations for slavery? I’ve actually written two. “Reparations USA” and then “Reparations Mind,” which came out in April. The truth is that the book isn’t specifically about Reparations, that may almost be a vehicle for the broader points.

If you read the first, book you’ll see that the real villain is surveillance, the surveillance state, as well as what we do to each other when we have these tools at our disposal. Basically a giant database which allows us to keep tabs on each other for things that our ancestors did, or maybe we did twenty years ago.

I think it lends itself to a lot of dangerous potential consequences. We’re even seeing this in the news today when social media mobs jump on whoever is the thought criminal du jour. As I say in this most recent book, “Reparations Mind,” at one point, since the advent of the internet we were all chasing after our fifteen minutes of fame, but now we’re running away from our fifteen seconds of shame.

But getting back to the original question, why did I write this book in the first place? I think I had a lot of ideas bottled up that accumulated over time, and they were just looking for the right outlet. But it all came together last June when a friend of a friend of mine did some very public SJW speech, if you will, or presentation that was just so over the top, and I was “triggered” into writing an editorial about this, and how that was representative of how far off the deep end the Left is going these days.

And I didn’t like the tone of the editorial, I felt it was a little bit too harsh. And I had had this note laying around that I had written sometime in the past, the past couple years, about what became in my book the Historical Reparations Administration. So I merged the two ideas together.

I took your female social justice warrior and I morphed her into my character of Kate Donohugh, who is a supervisor at the Historical Reparations Administration office in Newark, New Jersey.

We follow her at the beginning of the first book, where she actually appears on an early morning talk show, “Tina Talk,” and it’s basically a puff piece as so often happens when these government employees go on shows, like Jon Stewart Show or Colbert, and yuk it up in front of a studio audience to basically propagandize what the government is doing.

And then we see her back at her field office interacting with Beneficiaries and Debtors, which are the two classes of people who either receive payments or pay into the program.

And then we also move to Newark, New Jersey, streets, where there’s a young black teenager, and his life is on the ground level, experience in a world where Reparations is three years in and the program is not really working as planned. He has dreams of being a musician and ends up writing a song which is critical of the HRA, which captures sentiment across the country. It becomes an overnight hit.

We also have a game show or reality TV show type spectacle, it’s called “DDM TV Live” and DDM stands for “direct descendant match,” where the super computer, MARVIN, “Macro Aggregating Restitution Vector Input Navigator,” scans old documents into the system and makes connections. And if your ancestors have something like ten or more violent interactions with somebody alse’s ancestors, they bring you on to the TV show for a Kumbaya moment where you basically hold hands and go off and work on some garden somewhere to put the old demons to bed, if you will.

Pretty ridiculous spectacle, almost the like “Running Man,” or yeah, “Running Man.” “Who loves you and who do you love?” Something like that, because a heavy topic like this, Reparations, I’d assume most other projects would take it in a pretty negative, revengeful way.

I believe both Amazon and Netflix are working on some sort of a show or a series about it, and from what I understand it’s all more like a fantasy, or “Twelve Years a Slave” or “Inglorious Basterds,” basically envisioning a history that never actually happened, or in the case of the other show, I guess it’s just another kind of a fantasy. If it wasn’t revenge, it’s that some policy was enacted in the late 19th century, which actually didn’t happen.

So my book is different, my series is different, because it takes place in 2028, it envisions in 2024 America’s first female, first Chinese-American president coming into office with her main campaign platform being this program. The HRA and Reparations.

So I put a lot of current-year-relevant things in the books. In addition to that I did try to make these books as fun as possible, because it’s a heavy topic and tensions… the divide across the country are just getting out of control. And it’s like social media is only exacerbating it. On the one hand you use it to make contact with people; on the other you’re just hitting each other over the head with this information.

Another reason why I tried to make it a little fun and zany is because I’m a big sci-fi fan. “Demolition Man” is one of my favorites that I revisited lately. Very ahead of its time, very clever, very fun. And I think that’s a great balance that you’d want to find when you’re doing sci-fi, speculating into the future, dystopian heavy subjects. Can you still have fun with it?

And that’s what I try to do… The original “Rollerball” with James Caan, another great sci-fi movie, dystopian, that maybe gets lost in the shuffle because people think the game itself is pretty silly. But great movie, and great commentary track too.

In the second book, I have a chapter that takes place in Las Vegas where they have just opened up a brand new Reparations-themed casino called Paybax, and it just has a lot of fun, zany flavors which you could say skirt the line between satire and ruffling people’s feathers, or triggering them.

But you know, the main problem I see on the Left right now is that they’re so sensitive, everything triggers them. And it reminds me of some video essay I saw back when I was in college twenty years ago taking photography classes, and there was a guy who was the subject of this, I guess it was an audio documentary, with still photographs.

And he was in the jungles, he was a doctor from America, and he was down… I want to say in Central or South America, very poor people in the jungles, and he just gave his life, every month, every day to help these people and help their children. I don’t know if it was the interviewer… somebody asked him a question about philosophy, and he grumbles, “Philosophy is for people with full bellies!”

And I really like that line because I see parallels with today’s people on the Left. They’re so coddled, they’re so spoiled, they’re allowed to get mad about everything but what matters. Whether it’s using the wrong word, being offensive, things that have nothing to do with life and death.

Basically so-called progressives are so bored and boring that they have nothing better to do than stick their noses in other people’s business, and always make them look over their own shoulders. “Have I offended you? Have I said something wrong?” And it’s just constricting our lives, it’s making it almost impossible to do anything, because they’re gonna dig up something on you.

And my book plays it out ten years from now where there’s this supercomputer which is scanning every document ever, it just can bring up everything you ever did. And I feel like it could just paralyze mankind.

So that’s why I say the villain is really the surveillance state, and Reparations is just a vehicle, and in some ways that’s just the extreme extension of this religion of Leftism, where they’re gonna make everything right, and of course at the core whiteness is the evil. Something white is the worst. Of course, most SJWs themselves are white, which I think is a product of the brainwashing, that they would feel like they have to do penance to make up or something that they’re not responsible for.

And the second book, “Reparations Mind,” gets very much into that, exploring the history of indoctrination. I’m hoping by keeping things fast-moving, humorous, and having likable characters of all different races, to avoid some of the pitfalls that you could easily fall into with this kind of a third-rail type of subject.

What’s interesting is the first book was written very quickly and it was almost like my mind and body were just ready, “You have to write this book now.” And it came out, it was… it’s less than 40,000 words, and it’s kind of a breezy, fast read. The second book is about 60,000 words and it took a lot more out of me to, basically transmute very big, heavy ideas and still keep it fun, still keep it fast-moving.

I utilized a lot more dialogue in the second book, and because I ended the second book on a cliffhanger, I’m now mapping out the third book as frantically as possible to complete the trilogy, with a possibility of more books if the series starts to catch on.

For this third book, even bigger ideas, even heavier ideas… I feel like our society right now is headed for some sort of an existential crisis having to do with all the tensions. Racially, socially, economically, even stuff having to do with AI, outsourcing… There’s really no meaningful work to be done. We have the spiritual void.

And I’m hoping to convey in the book, which takes place in 2028, some insights and some lessons that we can apply to our lives now over the next few years, so that we avoid any sort of conflagration of this, I call it “the cold-pressed civil war,” where people are in coffee shops lobbing Twitter bombs at each other across the table on their computers.

If that goes hot… we don’t really want it. In our veins, our blood, it may want it, may want violence. We’re ready, it’s been a long time. But in our hearts and our minds, we’ve got to say no, it’s only gonna bring suffering, knock America’s prestige off the world stage, and a lot of other bad forces from around the world will be happy to leap in and mess with us or take over, and maybe not be as benign as we hope we are.

Another thing about people on the Left that concerns me is where they are mentally. What’s their approach? I’m really debating, are they disingenuous? Lying? Stupid? Naive? Lacking any foresight? It just seems like sometimes their world is a middle school pep rally of just, rah-rah, “You’re so great. YOU’RE so great!”

But there’s no actual thinking being done, there’s no arguments being put together. Yet they feel like because they have the buzzwords, the feel-good catchphrases, they have the moral high ground and get to shame and incriminate everybody else on the Right, who basically… we’re just grumps, we’re jerks, we’re bigots, we’re hateful. All those catchphrases they use to just take control of the conversation.

And as we move toward this “Idiocracy” future which is coming true day by day… If you try to articulate an argument properly, you sound like Luke Wilson, everybody just laughs at you because they can’t understand. So I don’t really know how to resolve that divide of willful ignorance under the guise of a pep rally, while the more wise people on the Right are taking so much flak.

So I think I’ll end this talk right here about my books, “Reparations USA,” “Reparations Mind.” I hope it’s been informative and intriguing to you. Right now “USA” is available free as an e-book on most sites, iTunes, Barnes & Noble, Kobo. Amazon has it for $0.99, they haven’t price matched it. And paperbacks available for both books, “Reparations USA” and “Mind” on Amazon.com.

And if you have any other questions for me about the book and the series, feel free to post them in the comments below and I’ll get back to you. Thanks for listening.

Download the e-book of “Reparations USA” free from these stores:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/reparations-usa/id1270546107
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/reparations-usa-philip-wyeth/1126963763
https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/reparations-usa
https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/741651

Amazon author page:
https://www.amazon.com/Philip-Wyeth/e/B0778R4T5T/

This video can also be watched on the following platforms:
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/bHKwXuBddxg
Steemit: https://steemit.com/books/@philipwyeth/mq3rpnve
Minds: https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/846781977817448448

Video was originally uploaded on May 25, 2018.

Conniving Change Agents of the Caramel Utopia

This is Philip Wyeth. The Left believes that it’s on a righteous crusade. A frantic mission driven by the historical narrative in their heads, and which silently guides them to heroically eradicate racism and oppression by intermixing and diluting all the races.

Under the cover of buzzwords like tolerance, inclusiveness, privilege… this army of change agents first goes about its stealth agenda by importing people from all over the world. Different cultures, different colors, different religions, different habits and beliefs.

But naturally, all the various groups are going to want to stick to their own kind, so step two of the plan employs the power of the educational system and the media. By day you immerse the children of immigrants into Democrat indoctrination centers, where teacher-zealots work in lockstep to erode family values and influence. Then after school, pop culture and Hollywood subversion fill in the gaps.

It’s all part of an unspoken brainwashing program to achieve the dream of some worldwide Utopian future which might best be described by paraphrasing the old blues song, “One Bourbon, One Scotch, and One Beer.” Something like, one skin tone, no god, and one leader.

The crucial point I have to stress when discussing issues like this—because people on the Left are so disingenuous or obtuse that they always take things out of context—is the distinction between natural processes and those driven by agendas. If people of different races and backgrounds get together organically, that is perfectly fine and how it should be—that’s the flow of life.

But for progressives to implant their ideas by stealth, and when you catch them, they raise their hands innocently, “Who, me?” That’s what I can’t stand. If your beliefs are so great, then you should be able to advertise them and stand by them proudly.

But instead, people who notice the disproportionate number of commercials and ads that show mixed-race couples where the man is black and the woman is white—we take the criticism and have dumb questions spit-balled at us, like, “What, you don’t think there should be interracial marriage?”

That is not the point at all! The issue is that there’s this army of sleeper agents who have been indoctrinated to seize every opportunity to pepper the world with Leftism. You know, each day, innocently add a sprinkle here and there as you go about your routine.

And worst of all, unlike people who get in your face to preach their religion, Leftists will deny that they’re doing anything explicit, and simply claim to be on the side of what’s right, progress, change.

I just want them to admit that yes, they do have an agenda, and every day they subconsciously work to serve it. It’s the secrecy and plausible deniability that has to go. You get caught manipulating society and then play dumb—but if your cause is so sacred, it’s saving the world from violence and ignorance and discrimination through… let’s call it “a melting pot destiny”… then stand up and proclaim it!

Be proud. Don’t cower from the truth of what you’re doing. Because otherwise you’re not part of the righteous underground—you’re collaborators too afraid to stand in the spotlight, let alone take a bullet for the cause which allegedly will end bigotry once and for all.

But of course, you have to do it this way. No one in their right mind would relinquish their religion, their heritage, their culture, their language in the name of a philosophy whose ideas killed over a hundred million people last century.

Being exposed like this is why the Left seems to be racing against the clock. And ruthless in their tactics. Got to shut down the YouTube channel or Twitter account of anyone who can articulate why they disagree with their Caramel Utopia.

So-called progressives never thought that social media platforms, which they dreamed, like some NPR platitude, were “working to build bridges across cultures,” would in fact be used to repair or reassert the importance of walls. Because maybe there’s wisdom in “good fences make good neighbors”—and more sensible than letting Leftist tanks and a million unvetted refugees roll across those bridges into our backyard without any plan for accommodation or assimilation.

The Left is cracking up because everything had been going so well for so long. Got their black president Obama in there, had true believers like Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel carrying the party’s water. But along the way, the Democrats kept losing governorships and Congressional seats. Then phenomena like Gamergate happened and the social tide began to turn. They got blindsided on election night 2016 and it still haven’t recovered.

So these people who live for checkbox milestones, like first female this or that, they see the upcoming midterm election as their D-Day. Of course we’re the literal Nazis in that passion play, so “by any means necessary” is the motto that will justify anything they might do to subvert conservatives.

Because their old haughty confidence, the matter-of-fact sense of inevitability, has been replaced by a vicious snarl—dangerous not because it’s trained and refined, but because it’s desperate.

They’ve lost sight of the goal. They lash out at allies who merely acknowledge the existence of the Democrat plantation, let alone dare to leave it. Even non-political people who make the mistake of wearing the wrong dress end up facing the wrath of their digital firing squad.

And here’s the lesson to be learned: When the veneer falls away in times of stress, conformists do not cooperate. It’s every non-gendered pronoun for zhitself, scrambling like rats for something solid as they drown in a sea of conflicting beliefs.

I’ll be here to keep tabs on the hypocritical Left’s dance of death as the election approaches. If you want to support me, buy my books Reparations USA and Reparations Mind on iTunes or Amazon. Also please subscribe to this channel. Thanks for listening.

– – –

Video can also be watched on the following platforms:
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/CUnpxlD1FVY
Minds: https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/839609796280029184
Steemit: https://steemit.com/politics/@philipwyeth/11hkpp7f

Video was originally uploaded on May 5, 2018.

Do Guatemalans Dream of the Gettysburg Address?

This is Philip Wyeth. Another Philip, one much more famous than me, once asked, “Do androids dream of electric sheep?” I’m going to paraphrase Philip K. Dick’s question to talk about the challenges we face after having taken in so many “new Americans” over the past twenty years.

Do Armenian immigrants learn about the old Jim Crow laws? Will Guatemalans from the migrant caravan study the Gettysburg Address? Can you convince an Indian working in Silicon Valley to take interest in the American Indian Wars?

This all may sound like hyperbole, or me trying to be cute, but what I’m driving at is the stark difference between America’s past and its future. A few days ago I dropped in at the local cigar shop to relax and get some writing done. Some regulars dropped in and started talking politics—at times things got heated, but these guys all know each other and honestly this is the kind of healthy debate I think people are starved for now that we only talk to each other through apps on our devices.

Most of the group was anti-Trump—not shocking since we’re in Los Angeles—but a couple of the guys were conservative and did their best to fend off the sometimes haughty questions the liberals were asking.

But the most interesting dynamic for me, and which leads back to the beginning of this talk, was a Jewish man in his seventies and a black man who was in his fifties or sixties. They both see the world through the prism of 1960s civil rights activism, and America’s legacy of slavery and racial discrimination.

There’s nothing wrong with that viewpoint in and of itself, but what they seem to miss is that so much has changed in just this century, that the old narratives don’t hold up anymore. Consider how these three concepts embody the change:

-The massive immigration with seemingly no rhyme or reason, and no consideration for the implications of assimilation or lack thereof, as well as demographic change. As Ann Coulter once pointed out to an audience of Latino students, who were not happy to hear her say it—America up until recently was once not multi-cultural, but biracial.

-Point two, a nationwide loss of wealth due to deindustrialization and several market collapses—with the surreal caveat being that instead of bread lines we all get to drink craft beer and eat organic food.

-And third, decentralization of narratives due to the internet. On the negative side is the disintegration of a national storyline and identity, but up for grabs is a more truthful tale, and perhaps some idealistic results—like internet flashmobs being able to prevent wars based on false pretenses.

So these old timers at the cigar shop, they don’t know about memes. They advocate for all kinds of immigration because they think it will help defeat lingering white racism—but at what point does this dilute the fabric of the country? They want one thing—racial justice—but the tools they’re using—massive immigration—could give us all an existential crisis.

Having lived in Los Angeles for many years and met people from all over the world—some I even do business with, so don’t try and pigeonhole me, please—but I can tell you that their primary motivation for coming here is to get away from repressive regimes or extreme poverty. Yes, they come here for a better life, as the talking point goes, but Americans on both sides of the aisle are deluding themselves if they think that many immigrants will study up on the Federalist Papers or the Dred Scott decision.

Maybe these things shouldn’t be on their radar, who knows? The great experiment of high-speed internet and touchscreens is what’s going on right now. Putting smartphones into the hands of people in the Third World can be like a world warp for their communities, and do far more than any “feed the children” infomercial on TV. Maybe it’s better if we’re all mentally free to take part in this technology free-for-all, without all the baggage or being tethered to the latest handful of new Abe Lincoln biographies.

But if we’re forced to abdicate not only our history but our culture, what is the point of our lives? To provide housing and plumbing to people from other countries? To publicly flagellate ourselves by virtue signaling on social media because our ancestors were bad?

Where do our supposed obligations end, and do the new Americans have any of their own? When does the brazenness of caravan migrants, whose supporters always find a way to rationalize people cutting in front of other would-be legal immigrants—when does this sense of entitlement give way to gratitude?

Or is the true sentiment, unspoken and hidden deep inside the hearts of everyone who’d rather kick in the door rather than knock, is it that the sins of the past are so great that America’s residents get no say? That the ledger of our historical guilt can only be evened out through pandering, confiscation, and eviction?

The most troubling aspect of all is that the Left is willing to drown out their opponents under a torrent of shame just because you disagree with them. They’ll get your account suspended, dox you, whatever it takes to shut you up. Why? Because deep in their hearts they fear being such an object of ridicule, standing alone in the public square taking abuse for a truly held belief.

Watch the 1970 Italian film The Conformist for a taste of the inner hell that progressive types who stand for nothing live and then unleash onto others.

Fortunately, today’s forecast only calls for Tweet-storms after one of them gets triggered, as just happened when a beautiful girl joyfully wore a Chinese dress to her high school prom—which of course was cultural appropriation.

How can all of this end peacefully, when on the one hand conservatives are forced to bake cakes that go against their beliefs, but also have no recourse when a private social media company deletes their account? The Left’s unholy alliance of aggression and hypocrisy is in fact creating the monsters they protest against, by breeding resentment in the hearts of good people who, while maybe not be as savvy as they are, only want to live quietly without being lectured to and sued for thoughtcrimes.

All I can do as a person with some life experience and the ability to distill ideas is to share my insights before things really get out of hand. Because conservatives have a lot of two things—patience and guns—and I have too many friends on both sides of the aisle to ever want to see our country descend into civil war.

Thanks for listening. Please subscribe to this channel, and you can find my novels on Amazon, iTunes, and Barnes & Noble.

– – –

Video can also be watched on the following platforms:
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/mOxI0qLA_cY
Minds: https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/838283196033679360
Steemit: https://steemit.com/politics/@philipwyeth/ir9kedlt

Video was originally uploaded on May 1, 2018.

Liberal Hypocrisy in the Cold-Pressed Civil War

This is Philip Wyeth. The Left is caught up in an arms race of virtue signaling, which leads to contradictions, and in the end, they always eat their own. The latest example comes to us from Manhattan, New York, where parents at a school meeting were furious that 25% of spaces would be allotted to children whose test scores fell below normal admittance standards, but who are also disadvantaged minorities.

I’ll include the link to the video where some of these parents express their anger. At one point a principal named Henry Zymeck says, “There are kids that are tremendously disadvantaged. And to compare these students and say, ‘My already advantaged kid needs more advantage, they need to be kept away from those kids,’ is tremendously offensive to me.”

This is good stuff. The elite of the elite liberals, who lecture the rest of the country about how great their inclusive belief system is, now circling the wagons when their own enclave is forced to accept diversity quotas. I’m willing to bet that none of these people voted for Donald Trump, and there’s probably pictures of a few of them holding signs denouncing hate at one of the women’s marches.

Look, I’m not even against them here. They worked hard and paid top dollar to get their kids into a school where academic achievement levels are very high. But I will savor the fact that they’re getting a taste of their own medicine. Their beliefs about privilege and unfairness, which they’ve forced on everyone else under penalty of social shame—what a pity that their own safe space is now threatened because some of their own progressive fellow travelers took things to eleven without consulting them.

People on the Left get themselves and society in trouble because they won’t ever let things play out organically. They’ll use the excuse that the legacy of oppression is so massive that “we have to do something,” but maybe the destabilization and resentment their ideas create are actually a worse result.

Nowadays anyone who leans conservative gets painted as a grump, or the bad guy. But maybe we just have a more pragmatic outlook about human nature and how things operate in the real world.

So many Democrats suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome still have not made peace with their 2016 election loss, or come to understand why it happened. What they’re going to find out is that people on the Right, who have kept quiet during years and years of being mocked and demonized—we are done. Whether it’s in polite company or in the public square, liberals’ days of mouthing off with impunity are over.

And if you’re on the Left, you should be scared. Not of violence, but because all those years you spent patting yourself on the back for having the right opinions, which you looked at like, “We hold these truths to be self-evident”—your minds have atrophied!

Meanwhile we, while fending off your attacks, have had to develop strong arguments to justify our existence. I think we wouldn’t even feel the need to flash our teeth if you Leftists had been gracious in defeat. But instead you keep doubling down on the self-righteousness, and now you own so many sacred cows that you’re devouring each other on a weekly basis.

It’s Kanye West facing a backlash for asserting the right to his own opinion. It’s Joy Reid’s non-apology for something she wrote a long time ago, when it could be argued that the culture was much different. And it’s the two white lesbians who adopted a handful of black kids as props, only to drive them off a cliff.

It’s you on the Left who are the problem. You’re holier-than-thou hypocrites with an incomplete worldview. And you lack the humility to step down from the podium where you utter feel-good platitudes toward your friends, then put people you disagree with on the defense through dishonest rhetoric.

But get ready for the next big disappointment. You’re putting all your eggs in the basket that is the midterm elections this fall—but what if the Democrat resurgence doesn’t happen? What if your transient or imported voters don’t turn out enough to help you take back the House?
What if a dozen more of your high-profile allies fall into disgrace while you’re out there chasing your own tail, barking about Russia and Stormy Daniels?

Right now it feels like each half of the country thinks the other political party is days away from scandal, exposure, and arrests that will sink their cabal. So the question is, who’s delusional and who’s not?

Is it the bleeding hearts, who move to red states like locusts after the policies enacted based on their beliefs bankrupted and filled their hometowns with crime?

Or is it the conservatives, who were so disillusioned by the two-party politics during the Bush and Obama years, that they said screw it, let’s give this crude loudmouth Trump a chance? Because he may not act “presidential,” but at least you know where he stands.

This country is coming up on some major shifts. Today we’re living in what I call the Cold-pressed Civil War—where one person at a coffee shop sipping on a fair-trade latte lobs Twitter bombs at another customer, who’s drinking organic Yerba Matte and firing her own social media missiles right back.

But the peace isn’t going to hold forever. There’s too many conflicting narratives, talking points, and accusations flying around. Over the next two elections, if the Democrats don’t get what they want, they’re going to rage under the guise of replaying some 1960s activist fantasy. And if they win, they’ll only turn the screws tighter on identity politics and demonizing white people.

This is why they’re desperate to ban guns. Everything they want to do relies on force. It is not hyperbole to say that Leftism always leads to mass murder—whether the poster boy is a mustached Bolshevik holding a rifle, or a scrawny Portlander in black-rimmed glasses and striped v-neck t-shirt drinking soy milk.

Today’s totalitarian may not have the balls to kill you himself, but he’ll find an app for that in his brand new iPhone, I’m sure.

Thanks for listening. Subscribe to this channel and check out my satirical dystopian novels, Reparations USA and Reparations Mind.

– – –

Video can also be watched on the following platforms:
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/pxfKMeh8iGpF
Minds: https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/837459451890298880

Video was originally uploaded on April 29, 2018.